1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
I will start by describing information-oriented society and how easy to access to information. Then i will shift attention to diadvantages and problems of easy approach to information and mention about information leakage such as resident registration number. I'll end my introduction with "Resident registration number should not be collected on the Internet."
2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
I will start by describing how much information on the internet and following information leakage problem. Among many problems i will describe the the problem of collecting resident registration number. Also I will show the statistic that show the damage of the problem. This statistic can explain why my argument is produced.
3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
1. Too many damages
Using damage case of leakage of resident registration number, i will inform the seriousness of the problem to people. Also i want to show how dangerous leakage of resident registration number and what kind of damage can we get.
2. Lose its value
First, i will explain the original functions of resident registration number and how it develop. Then i will explain corrupt purpose of collecting resident registration number. Also i will explain why the number lose its value.
3. Safer alternative
I'll suggest the alternative of resident registration number and its advantages. Also i will emphasize the its strength compared with resident registration number and how it complement weakness of resident registration number.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I think the opponents mention the alternative of resident registration number that is not appropriate to replace it. Also they may say if collecting resident registration number is banned, there are no way to recognize people. Then, i will suggest the information about the alternative and explain how it complement weakness of resident registration number. Also I will explain how we can recognize people without resident registration number.
5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
I will close with a summary of my previous points, and emphasize damage of leakage of resident registration number, and have a brief consideration of the positive result when collecting resident registration number is banned. I will end with a reaffirmation of my original thesis.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기